Electronic transactions, as one of the emerging phenomena in the contemporary world, have brought about significant changes in economic and social spheres. These transactions, conducted through electronic tools such as the internet, are accompanied by numerous challenges and opportunities. From the perspective of Shia jurisprudence, analyzing the legitimacy and validity of these transactions necessitates a thorough examination of Islamic principles and rules. This article aims to conduct a jurisprudential and principled analysis of electronic transactions, exploring the foundations and conditions for their validity, and discussing issues such as offer and acceptance, digital ownership, and the legitimacy of using cryptocurrencies. In this regard, key concepts such as electronic transactions and the general principles of jurisprudence in transactions will first be elucidated. Then, jurisprudential and principled foundations such as offer and acceptance in the virtual space, the value of the subject of the transaction, and the adherence to general contract conditions will be examined. Furthermore, challenges such as ambiguity (gharar) and legal issues related to cryptocurrencies will be analyzed, and solutions such as information transparency and dynamic ijtihad will be proposed. The results indicate that by adhering to the conditions for the validity of transactions and aligning jurisprudential principles with contemporary needs, many of the Sharia-related challenges of electronic transactions can be addressed. Ultimately, the use of dynamic ijtihad and the formulation of jurisprudential regulations suited to modern conditions play a crucial role in resolving these issues.
موسوی خمینی، روحالله.(1379). البیع، ج 5، تهران: مؤسسه تنظیم و نشر آثار امام خمینی.
نجفی، محمدحسن. (1375). جواهر الکلام. قم: موسسه نشر جواهر.
نراقی، محمدمهدی. (1417 ق). عوائد الایام، ج1، تهران: التابع لمکتب الإعلام الإسلامی.
Obeidat, B. (2020). E-commerce in Islamic Jurisprudence. Amman: Islamic Studies Press.
Ahmed, K. & Ali, M. (2021). Sharia-compliant cryptocurrency and digital transactions in Islamic finance. Islamic Finance Review, 18(2), 55-67.
Alqahtani, A. (2020). Sharia compliance and digital currencies: A legal and economic review. Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance, 14(3), 98-112.
Gonzalez, L. & Jackson, A. (2021). Intellectual property in the digital age: Protection and enforcement of digital assets. International Journal of Technology Law, 12(1), 51- 62.
Mitchell, A. & Hayes, T. (2021). Privacy laws in the digital age: Protection of personal data in the virtual marketplace. Journal of Privacy Law, 9(2), 67-80.
Reed, C. (2020). Digital contracts and the challenges of online agreements. Journal of Internet Law, 24(1), 22-35.
Zohar, R. & Bitton, Y. (2021). Legal and Regulatory Challenges of Digital Currencies. International Journal of Financial Regulation, 10(3), 42-56
Arzani,N. (2024). The challenges of electronic transactions and the legitimizing solutions for them from the perspective of Imamiyah jurisprudence.. Jurisprudence studies and cultural law, 1(1), 101-127. doi: 10.22034/cjls.2025.2049684.1019
MLA
Arzani,N. . "The challenges of electronic transactions and the legitimizing solutions for them from the perspective of Imamiyah jurisprudence.", Jurisprudence studies and cultural law, 1, 1, 2024, 101-127. doi: 10.22034/cjls.2025.2049684.1019
HARVARD
Arzani N. (2024). 'The challenges of electronic transactions and the legitimizing solutions for them from the perspective of Imamiyah jurisprudence.', Jurisprudence studies and cultural law, 1(1), pp. 101-127. doi: 10.22034/cjls.2025.2049684.1019
CHICAGO
N. Arzani, "The challenges of electronic transactions and the legitimizing solutions for them from the perspective of Imamiyah jurisprudence.," Jurisprudence studies and cultural law, 1 1 (2024): 101-127, doi: 10.22034/cjls.2025.2049684.1019
VANCOUVER
Arzani N. The challenges of electronic transactions and the legitimizing solutions for them from the perspective of Imamiyah jurisprudence.. Jurisprudence studies and cultural law, 2024; 1(1): 101-127. doi: 10.22034/cjls.2025.2049684.1019
