The social realization of Islamic value propositions requires not only legislation but a cultural-discursive process where meaning, language, institutions, and social action interact. Drawing on an integrative framework that selectively employs Foucauldian discourse concepts (repetition, symbolization, institutional roles) while critiquing his relativism and constructivism, this study grounds itself in fiṭrah (innate disposition), real criteria of rulings (malākāt), established religious custom (ʿurf), and jurisprudential pedagogy (fiqh al-tarbiyyī). It examines how religious propagation can bridge the gap between a jurisprudential ruling and a socially accepted norm. Findings show that rational persuasion based on explaining malākāt, ethical persuasion with role-modeling from reference groups, balanced emotional appeal, repetition, symbolization, and the use of media, art, and social action are key mechanisms for transforming meaning into culture. When accompanied by religious legitimacy, comprehensible language, coordinated institutional support, and communicative integrity, these elements foster norm internalization, reduce social resistance, and increase voluntary compliance. The proposed model maps the transition from ruling to social norm across four levels – meaning, discourse, institution, and action – and illustrates its application through a case study of ḥijāb law. The study concludes that the sustainable enforceability of jurisprudential norms is not merely legal but depends on religious discourse formation integrating jurisprudence, propagation, and culture.