Jurisprudence studies and cultural law

Jurisprudence studies and cultural law

Targeted Assassinations of Iranian Scientists and Military Commanders: An Analysis of International Crime within the Framework of Human Rights

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Attorney and member of the Judiciary Lawyers Center, Master's degree, Criminal Law and Criminology, Pishva Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. Email: amirhoseint689@gmail.com
2 Attorney at Law, Member of the Center of Judiciary Lawyers, and Assistant Professor of Law, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran. (Corresponding Author). Email: amin.amani.b@gmail.com
Abstract
The phenomenon of targeted assassinations of scientists and military commanders of the Islamic Republic of Iran by actors such as the United States of America and the Israeli regime has raised fundamental questions in the field of international law, particularly human rights law. This study aims to analyze these acts within the framework of international human rights and to assess their characterization as international crimes. Employing a descriptive-analytical method and relying on foundational human rights instruments such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and International Humanitarian Law, the findings indicate that targeted killings outside the framework of armed conflicts constitute a clear violation of fundamental principles such as the right to life, the prohibition of extrajudicial executions, and the right to a fair trial. Furthermore, based on the criteria for the formation of international crimes—including gravity, systematic nature, and breaches of peremptory norms—it is argued that such assassinations may amount to crimes against humanity, as they form part of an organized and widespread policy directed against a civilian group or specific population for political purposes. The article further elaborates on the international responsibility of violating states and explores avenues for prosecuting these crimes before international tribunals.
Keywords

 
ـ قرآن کریم
1. اعتمادفر، سحر (1402). ترور دانشمندان هسته‌ای ایران از منظر حقوق بین‌الملل (چگونگی پیگرد حقوقی بین‌المللی شهید محسن فخری‌زاده). در کنفرانس بین‌المللی فقه، حقوق و پژوهش‌های دینی (دوره 8). دانشگاه شیراز.
2. بصیری جم، علی‌اصغر (1403). یک ترور در تهران و چندین هدف در نظام سیاسی بین‌المللی. تارنمای دیپلماسی ایرانی.
3. دهقانی فیروزآبادی، جلال (1403). هسته سخت نظام ملت ایران هستند: ضرورت همراهی دیپلماسی و قدرت نظامی. خبرگزاری ایرنا.
4. رشیدی، مهناز (1399).امکان‌سنجی طرح دعوا در محاکم قضایی بین‌المللی و داخلی در موضوع ترور سردار سلیمانی و همراهان. مجله حقوقی دادگستری، دوره 84، شماره 111، صص 107 ـ 127. https://doi.org/10.22106/jlj.2020.122352.3223
5. سرتیپی، حسین؛ بردبار، احمدرضا؛ موسی‌زاده، محمد (1391). بررسی و نقد ترور هدفمند، مبارزه با تروریسم و حقوق مخاصمات مسلحانه بین‌المللی. فصلنامه پژوهش‌های حقوق عمومی، دوره 14، شماره 38، صص 39 ـ 76.
6. شفیعی سیف‌آبادی، محسن (1399). تبیین پروژه ترور دانشمندان هسته‌ای و آینده‌پژوهی اقدامات متقابل ایران. نشریه پژوهش‌های حفاظتی ـ امنیتی، شماره 34، دوره 9.
7. شهید ثانی، زین‌الدین (1413ه.ق). مسالک الافهام (جلد 2). قم: مؤسسة المعارف الاسلامیة.
8. صالحی، محمدخلیل و سلمانی فرهمند، محمد (1400). تحلیل ترور دانشمندان هسته‌ای ایران از منظر حقوق داخلی و بین‌الملل. دوفصلنامه تمدن حقوقی، دوره 4، شماره 9، صص 407 ـ 432. https://www.pzhfars.ir/article_140248.html
9. ضیایی بیگدلی، محمدرضا (1401). حقوق بین‌الملل عمومی (چاپ بیست‌وهفتم). تهران: انتشارات گنج دانش.
10. عالمه، عباس (1390). جنایت علیه بشریت در حقوق بین‌الملل کیفری. تهران: انتشارات میزان.
11. قاسمی، فائزه (1404).جهان طی دو دهه اخیر برای مبارزه با تروریسم چه کرده است؟ خبرگزاری ایسنا.
12. کرمی، سعید؛ محمدخانی، محمدرضا و طیب، محسن (1401). ترور سردار سلیمانی از منظر اصول و قواعد حقوقی. سیاست دفاعی، دوره 13، شماره 118، صص 37 ـ 11. 
https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.10255087.1401.31.1.1.8
13. کوشا، جعفر؛ علیزاده، اکبر؛ یکتا، علی (1403). بررسی حقوقی ترور سردار سلیمانی از منظر اسناد بین‌المللی. فصلنامه حقوق تعالی، دوره 10، شماره 1، صص 31 ـ 66.
https://doi.org/10.22034/thdad.2023.1988002.2363
14. نجفی، محمدحسن (1404ه.ق). جواهر الکلام (جلد 42). بیروت: دار احیاء التراث العربی.
1. Adib-Moghaddam, A. (2017). Psycho-nationalism: Global thought, Iranian imaginaries. Cambridge University Press.
2. Ahmadi, Z. and Dehshiri, M. (2025). A constructivist analysis of the confrontation between the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Israeli Regime in the 2025 war. Journal of Countries Studies, 1-35.
https://doi.org/10.22059/jcountst.2025.399915.1330
3. Cohen, A. P. (1985). The symbolic construction of community. Routledge.
4. Corten, O. (2010). The law against war: The prohibition on the use of force in contemporary international law. Hart Publishing.
5. Habermas, J. (1981). The theory of communicative action, Volume 1: Reason and the rationalization of society. Beacon Press.
6. Human Rights Committee. (2018). General Comment No. 36 on Article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life. CCPR/C/GC/36.
7. International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). (1977). Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I).
8. International Court of Justice. (1986). Military and paramilitary activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America), merits, judgment. I.C.J. Reports 1986.
9. International Criminal Court (ICC). (1998). Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.
10. International Criminal Court (ICC). (2010). Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala. Resolution RC/Res.6.
11. Jennings, R. Y. (1938). The Caroline and McLeod cases. The American Journal of International Law, 32(1), 82–99.
12. Melzer, N. (2020, July). Extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions: Report on the targeted killing of General Qassem Soleimani. United Nations Human Rights Council.
13. Milanovic, M. (2013). Targeted Killings and International Law. European Journal of International Law, University of Reading.
14. Nafar, Z. and Gharaei, T. (2025). The role of political and social changes in the violation of fair trial principles. Journal of Law and Political Studies, 5 (2), 260-274. https://doi.org/10.48309/jlps.2025.516028.1350
15. Nowak, M. (2019). U.N. Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: CCPR Commentary.
16. Schabas, W. A. (2015). The European Convention on Human Rights: A commentary. Oxford University Press.
17. Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1988). Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. International Social Movement Research, 1(1), 197–217.
18. Soltani, A. (2020). The martyr and the media: The symbolic politics of Qasem Soleimani's assassination. Middle East Journal of Culture and Communication, 13(3), 245-265.
19. Tilly, C. (1978). From mobilization to revolution. McGraw-Hill.
20. United Nations General Assembly. (1974). Resolution 3314 (XXIX): Definition of aggression. United Nations.
21. United Nations. (1945). Charter of the United Nations. 1 UNTS XVI. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/en/about-us/un-charter
22. Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (VCLT). (1969). Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 23 May 1969, United Nations Treaty Series, 1155, 331.